Well, we knew that already. But it’s nice to have algorithmic confirmation…
just another too easy story
[snip]
Consider: Action precedes perception.
Or: There is something outside the room, but in order to find out what it is, you need to go outside the room.
Or: Rice planting will now be taught in the paddy fields.
Hah! I lol’d. Thanks Kristen. Really bummed I’m going to miss the Kubrick/Stephenson/Delany discussion tomorrow (today).
If it were ideal, the plan would include how to get around the folks that need turning around.
THIS IS FUCKING ESSENTIAL
Which heads can I tattoo this on
(via lilzet)
#obnoxious #worthless #offensive #superfluous #crap
…plus, I can’t even click on his crotch. #wtf
#folksonomies-are-hilarious
This might also be a guide to reading this blog.
oh my god yes yes yes yes
“ They always say time changes things, but you actually have to change them yourself.
A. Warhol (comment from “Anonymous” on James Landay’s “I give up on CHI/UIST” post).
“ You want a proof. I guess that means that you want to be more convinced that the Propositional Calculus is consistent than you are convinced of your own sanity. Any proof I could think of would involve mental operations of a greater complexity than anything in the Propositional Calculus itself. So what would it prove? Your desire for a proof of consistency of the Propositional Calculus makes me think of someone who is learning English and insists on being given a dictionary which defines all the simple words in terms of complicated ones…
Imprudence, in Hofstadter’s GEB (via tristn).
Win
